\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*- @comment The source is gforth.ds, from which gforth.texi is generated @comment %**start of header (This is for running Texinfo on a region.) @setfilename gforth.info @settitle GNU Forth Manual @comment @setchapternewpage odd @comment %**end of header (This is for running Texinfo on a region.) @ifinfo This file documents GNU Forth 0.0 Copyright @copyright{} 1994 GNU Forth Development Group Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. @ignore Permission is granted to process this file through TeX and print the results, provided the printed document carries a copying permission notice identical to this one except for the removal of this paragraph (this paragraph not being relevant to the printed manual). @end ignore Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also that the sections entitled "Distribution" and "General Public License" are included exactly as in the original, and provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this one. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that the sections entitled "Distribution" and "General Public License" may be included in a translation approved by the author instead of in the original English. @end ifinfo @titlepage @sp 10 @center @titlefont{GNU Forth Manual} @sp 2 @center for version 0.0 @sp 2 @center Anton Ertl @comment The following two commands start the copyright page. @page @vskip 0pt plus 1filll Copyright @copyright{} 1994 GNU Forth Development Group @comment !! Published by ... or You can get a copy of this manual ... Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also that the sections entitled "Distribution" and "General Public License" are included exactly as in the original, and provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this one. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that the sections entitled "Distribution" and "General Public License" may be included in a translation approved by the author instead of in the original English. @end titlepage @node Top, License, (dir), (dir) @ifinfo GNU Forth is a free implementation of ANS Forth available on many personal machines. This manual corresponds to version 0.0. @end ifinfo @menu * License:: * Goals:: About the GNU Forth Project * Other Books:: Things you might want to read * Invocation:: Starting GNU Forth * Words:: Forth words available in GNU Forth * ANS conformance:: Implementation-defined options etc. * Model:: The abstract machine of GNU Forth * Emacs and GForth:: The GForth Mode * Internals:: Implementation details * Bugs:: How to report them * Pedigree:: Ancestors of GNU Forth * Word Index:: An item for each Forth word * Node Index:: An item for each node @end menu @node License, Goals, Top, Top @unnumbered License !! Insert GPL here @iftex @unnumbered Preface This manual documents GNU Forth. The reader is expected to know Forth. This manual is primarily a reference manual. @xref{Other Books} for introductory material. @end iftex @node Goals, Other Books, License, Top @comment node-name, next, previous, up @chapter Goals of GNU Forth @cindex Goals The goal of the GNU Forth Project is to develop a standard model for ANSI Forth. This can be split into several subgoals: @itemize @bullet @item GNU Forth should conform to the ANSI Forth standard. @item It should be a model, i.e. it should define all the implementation-dependent things. @item It should become standard, i.e. widely accepted and used. This goal is the most difficult one. @end itemize To achieve these goals GNU Forth should be @itemize @bullet @item Similar to previous models (fig-Forth, F83) @item Powerful. It should provide for all the things that are considered necessary today and even some that are not yet considered necessary. @item Efficient. It should not get the reputation of being exceptionally slow. @item Free. @item Available on many machines/easy to port. @end itemize Have we achieved these goals? GNU Forth conforms to the ANS Forth standard; it may be considered a model, but we have not yet documented which parts of the model are stable and which parts we are likely to change; it certainly has not yet become a de facto standard. It has some similarities and some differences to previous models; It has some powerful features, but not yet everything that we envisioned; on RISCs it is as fast as interpreters programmed in assembly, on register-starved machines it is not so fast, but still faster than any other C-based interpretive implementation; it is free and available on many machines. @node Other Books, Invocation, Goals, Top @chapter Other books on ANS Forth As the standard is relatively new, there are not many books out yet. It is not recommended to learn Forth by using GNU Forth and a book that is not written for ANS Forth, as you will not know your mistakes from the deviations of the book. There is, of course, the standard, the definite reference if you want to write ANS Forth programs. It will be available in printed form from Global Engineering Documents !! somtime in spring or summer 1994. If you are lucky, you can still get dpANS6 (the draft that was approved as standard) by aftp from ftp.uu.net:/vendor/minerva/x3j14. @cite{Forth: The new model} by Jack Woehr (!! Publisher) is an introductory book based on a draft version of the standard. It does not cover the whole standard. It also contains interesting background information (Jack Woehr was in the ANS Forth Technical Committe). It is not appropriate for complete newbies, but programmers experienced in other languages should find it ok. @node Invocation, Words, Other Books, Top @chapter Invocation You will usually just say @code{gforth}. In many other cases the default GNU Forth image will be invoked like this: @example gforth [files] [-e forth-code] @end example executing the contents of the files and the Forth code in the order they are given. In general, the command line looks like this: @example gforth [initialization options] [image-specific options] @end example The initialization options must come before the rest of the command line. They are: @table @code @item --image-file @var{file} Loads the Forth image @var{file} instead of the default @file{gforth.fi}. @item --path @var{path} Uses @var{path} for searching the image file and Forth source code files instead of the default in the environment variable @code{GFORTHPATH} or the path specified at installation time (typically @file{/usr/local/lib/gforth:.}). A path is given as a @code{:}-separated list. @item --dictionary-size @var{size} @item -m @var{size} Allocate @var{size} space for the Forth dictionary space instead of using the default specified in the image (typically 256K). The @var{size} specification consists of an integer and a unit (e.g., @code{4M}). The unit can be one of @code{b} (bytes), @code{e} (element size, in this case Cells), @code{k} (kilobytes), and @code{M} (Megabytes). If no unit is specified, @code{e} is used. @item --data-stack-size @var{size} @item -d @var{size} Allocate @var{size} space for the data stack instead of using the default specified in the image (typically 16K). @item --return-stack-size @var{size} @item -r @var{size} Allocate @var{size} space for the return stack instead of using the default specified in the image (typically 16K). @item --fp-stack-size @var{size} @item -f @var{size} Allocate @var{size} space for the floating point stack instead of using the default specified in the image (typically 16K). In this case the unit specifier @code{e} refers to floating point numbers. @item --locals-stack-size @var{size} @item -l @var{size} Allocate @var{size} space for the locals stack instead of using the default specified in the image (typically 16K). @end table As explained above, the image-specific command-line arguments for the default image @file{gforth.fi} consist of a sequence of filenames and @code{-e @var{forth-code}} options that are interpreted in the seqence in which they are given. The @code{-e @var{forth-code}} or @code{--evaluate @var{forth-code}} option evaluates the forth code. This option takes only one argument; if you want to evaluate more Forth words, you have to quote them or use several @code{-e}s. To exit after processing the command line (instead of entering interactive mode) append @code{-e bye} to the command line. Not yet implemented: On startup the system first executes the system initialization file (unless the option @code{--no-init-file} is given; note that the system resulting from using this option may not be ANS Forth conformant). Then the user initialization file @file{.gforth.fs} is executed, unless the option @code{--no-rc} is given; this file is first searched in @file{.}, then in @file{~}, then in the normal path (see above). @node Words, ANS conformance, Invocation, Top @chapter Forth Words @menu * Notation:: * Arithmetic:: * Stack Manipulation:: * Memory access:: * Control Structures:: * Locals:: * Defining Words:: * Wordlists:: * Files:: * Blocks:: * Other I/O:: * Programming Tools:: * Threading Words:: @end menu @node Notation, Arithmetic, Words, Words @section Notation The Forth words are described in this section in the glossary notation that has become a de-facto standard for Forth texts, i.e. @format @var{word} @var{Stack effect} @var{wordset} @var{pronunciation} @end format @var{Description} @table @var @item word The name of the word. BTW, GNU Forth is case insensitive, so you can type the words in in lower case (However, @pxref{core-idef}). @item Stack effect The stack effect is written in the notation @code{@var{before} -- @var{after}}, where @var{before} and @var{after} describe the top of stack entries before and after the execution of the word. The rest of the stack is not touched by the word. The top of stack is rightmost, i.e., a stack sequence is written as it is typed in. Note that GNU Forth uses a separate floating point stack, but a unified stack notation. Also, return stack effects are not shown in @var{stack effect}, but in @var{Description}. The name of a stack item describes the type and/or the function of the item. See below for a discussion of the types. @item pronunciation How the word is pronounced @item wordset The ANS Forth standard is divided into several wordsets. A standard system need not support all of them. So, the fewer wordsets your program uses the more portable it will be in theory. However, we suspect that most ANS Forth systems on personal machines will feature all wordsets. Words that are not defined in the ANS standard have @code{gforth} as wordset. @item Description A description of the behaviour of the word. @end table The type of a stack item is specified by the character(s) the name starts with: @table @code @item f Bool, i.e. @code{false} or @code{true}. @item c Char @item w Cell, can contain an integer or an address @item n signed integer @item u unsigned integer @item d double sized signed integer @item ud double sized unsigned integer @item r Float @item a_ Cell-aligned address @item c_ Char-aligned address (note that a Char is two bytes in Windows NT) @item f_ Float-aligned address @item df_ Address aligned for IEEE double precision float @item sf_ Address aligned for IEEE single precision float @item xt Execution token, same size as Cell @item wid Wordlist ID, same size as Cell @item f83name Pointer to a name structure @end table @node Arithmetic, Stack Manipulation, Notation, Words @section Arithmetic Forth arithmetic is not checked, i.e., you will not hear about integer overflow on addition or multiplication, you may hear about division by zero if you are lucky. The operator is written after the operands, but the operands are still in the original order. I.e., the infix @code{2-1} corresponds to @code{2 1 -}. Forth offers a variety of division operators. If you perform division with potentially negative operands, you do not want to use @code{/} or @code{/mod} with its undefined behaviour, but rather @code{fm/mod} or @code{sm/mod} (probably the former, @pxref{Mixed precision}). @menu * Single precision:: * Bitwise operations:: * Mixed precision:: operations with single and double-cell integers * Double precision:: Double-cell integer arithmetic * Floating Point:: @end menu @node Single precision, Bitwise operations, Arithmetic, Arithmetic @subsection Single precision doc-+ doc-- doc-* doc-/ doc-mod doc-/mod doc-negate doc-abs doc-min doc-max @node Bitwise operations, Mixed precision, Single precision, Arithmetic @subsection Bitwise operations doc-and doc-or doc-xor doc-invert doc-2* doc-2/ @node Mixed precision, Double precision, Bitwise operations, Arithmetic @subsection Mixed precision doc-m+ doc-*/ doc-*/mod doc-m* doc-um* doc-m*/ doc-um/mod doc-fm/mod doc-sm/rem @node Double precision, Floating Point, Mixed precision, Arithmetic @subsection Double precision doc-d+ doc-d- doc-dnegate doc-dabs doc-dmin doc-dmax @node Floating Point, , Double precision, Arithmetic @subsection Floating Point Angles in floating point operations are given in radians (a full circle has 2 pi radians). Note, that gforth has a separate floating point stack, but we use the unified notation. Floating point numbers have a number of unpleasant surprises for the unwary (e.g., floating point addition is not associative) and even a few for the wary. You should not use them unless you know what you are doing or you don't care that the results you get are totally bogus. If you want to learn about the problems of floating point numbers (and how to avoid them), you might start with @cite{David Goldberg, What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic, ACM Computing Surveys 23(1):5@minus{}48, March 1991}. doc-f+ doc-f- doc-f* doc-f/ doc-fnegate doc-fabs doc-fmax doc-fmin doc-floor doc-fround doc-f** doc-fsqrt doc-fexp doc-fexpm1 doc-fln doc-flnp1 doc-flog doc-falog doc-fsin doc-fcos doc-fsincos doc-ftan doc-fasin doc-facos doc-fatan doc-fatan2 doc-fsinh doc-fcosh doc-ftanh doc-fasinh doc-facosh doc-fatanh @node Stack Manipulation, Memory access, Arithmetic, Words @section Stack Manipulation gforth has a data stack (aka parameter stack) for characters, cells, addresses, and double cells, a floating point stack for floating point numbers, a return stack for storing the return addresses of colon definitions and other data, and a locals stack for storing local variables. Note that while every sane Forth has a separate floating point stack, this is not strictly required; an ANS Forth system could theoretically keep floating point numbers on the data stack. As an additional difficulty, you don't know how many cells a floating point number takes. It is reportedly possible to write words in a way that they work also for a unified stack model, but we do not recommend trying it. Instead, just say that your program has an environmental dependency on a separate FP stack. Also, a Forth system is allowed to keep the local variables on the return stack. This is reasonable, as local variables usually eliminate the need to use the return stack explicitly. So, if you want to produce a standard complying program and if you are using local variables in a word, forget about return stack manipulations in that word (see the standard document for the exact rules). @menu * Data stack:: * Floating point stack:: * Return stack:: * Locals stack:: * Stack pointer manipulation:: @end menu @node Data stack, Floating point stack, Stack Manipulation, Stack Manipulation @subsection Data stack doc-drop doc-nip doc-dup doc-over doc-tuck doc-swap doc-rot doc--rot doc-?dup doc-pick doc-roll doc-2drop doc-2nip doc-2dup doc-2over doc-2tuck doc-2swap doc-2rot @node Floating point stack, Return stack, Data stack, Stack Manipulation @subsection Floating point stack doc-fdrop doc-fnip doc-fdup doc-fover doc-ftuck doc-fswap doc-frot @node Return stack, Locals stack, Floating point stack, Stack Manipulation @subsection Return stack doc->r doc-r> doc-r@ doc-rdrop doc-2>r doc-2r> doc-2r@ doc-2rdrop @node Locals stack, Stack pointer manipulation, Return stack, Stack Manipulation @subsection Locals stack @node Stack pointer manipulation, , Locals stack, Stack Manipulation @subsection Stack pointer manipulation doc-sp@ doc-sp! doc-fp@ doc-fp! doc-rp@ doc-rp! doc-lp@ doc-lp! @node Memory access, Control Structures, Stack Manipulation, Words @section Memory access @menu * Stack-Memory transfers:: * Address arithmetic:: * Memory block access:: @end menu @node Stack-Memory transfers, Address arithmetic, Memory access, Memory access @subsection Stack-Memory transfers doc-@ doc-! doc-+! doc-c@ doc-c! doc-2@ doc-2! doc-f@ doc-f! doc-sf@ doc-sf! doc-df@ doc-df! @node Address arithmetic, Memory block access, Stack-Memory transfers, Memory access @subsection Address arithmetic ANS Forth does not specify the sizes of the data types. Instead, it offers a number of words for computing sizes and doing address arithmetic. Basically, address arithmetic is performed in terms of address units (aus); on most systems the address unit is one byte. Note that a character may have more than one au, so @code{chars} is no noop (on systems where it is a noop, it compiles to nothing). ANS Forth also defines words for aligning addresses for specific addresses. Many computers require that accesses to specific data types must only occur at specific addresses; e.g., that cells may only be accessed at addresses divisible by 4. Even if a machine allows unaligned accesses, it can usually perform aligned accesses faster. For the performance-concious: alignment operations are usually only necessary during the definition of a data structure, not during the (more frequent) accesses to it. ANS Forth defines no words for character-aligning addresses. This is not an oversight, but reflects the fact that addresses that are not char-aligned have no use in the standard and therefore will not be created. The standard guarantees that addresses returned by @code{CREATE}d words are cell-aligned; in addition, gforth guarantees that these addresses are aligned for all purposes. Note that the standard defines a word @code{char}, which has nothing to do with address arithmetic. doc-chars doc-char+ doc-cells doc-cell+ doc-align doc-aligned doc-floats doc-float+ doc-falign doc-faligned doc-sfloats doc-sfloat+ doc-sfalign doc-sfaligned doc-dfloats doc-dfloat+ doc-dfalign doc-dfaligned doc-maxalign doc-maxaligned doc-cfalign doc-cfaligned doc-address-unit-bits @node Memory block access, , Address arithmetic, Memory access @subsection Memory block access doc-move doc-erase While the previous words work on address units, the rest works on characters. doc-cmove doc-cmove> doc-fill doc-blank @node Control Structures, Locals, Memory access, Words @section Control Structures Control structures in Forth cannot be used in interpret state, only in compile state, i.e., in a colon definition. We do not like this limitation, but have not seen a satisfying way around it yet, although many schemes have been proposed. @menu * Selection:: * Simple Loops:: * Counted Loops:: * Arbitrary control structures:: * Calls and returns:: * Exception Handling:: @end menu @node Selection, Simple Loops, Control Structures, Control Structures @subsection Selection @example @var{flag} IF @var{code} ENDIF @end example or @example @var{flag} IF @var{code1} ELSE @var{code2} ENDIF @end example You can use @code{THEN} instead of @code{ENDIF}. Indeed, @code{THEN} is standard, and @code{ENDIF} is not, although it is quite popular. We recommend using @code{ENDIF}, because it is less confusing for people who also know other languages (and is not prone to reinforcing negative prejudices against Forth in these people). Adding @code{ENDIF} to a system that only supplies @code{THEN} is simple: @example : endif POSTPONE then ; immediate @end example [According to @cite{Webster's New Encyclopedic Dictionary}, @dfn{then (adv.)} has the following meanings: @quotation ... 2b: following next after in order ... 3d: as a necessary consequence (if you were there, then you saw them). @end quotation Forth's @code{THEN} has the meaning 2b, whereas @code{THEN} in Pascal and many other programming languages has the meaning 3d.] We also provide the words @code{?dup-if} and @code{?dup-0=-if}, so you can avoid using @code{?dup}. @example @var{n} CASE @var{n1} OF @var{code1} ENDOF @var{n2} OF @var{code2} ENDOF @dots{} ENDCASE @end example Executes the first @var{codei}, where the @var{ni} is equal to @var{n}. A default case can be added by simply writing the code after the last @code{ENDOF}. It may use @var{n}, which is on top of the stack, but must not consume it. @node Simple Loops, Counted Loops, Selection, Control Structures @subsection Simple Loops @example BEGIN @var{code1} @var{flag} WHILE @var{code2} REPEAT @end example @var{code1} is executed and @var{flag} is computed. If it is true, @var{code2} is executed and the loop is restarted; If @var{flag} is false, execution continues after the @code{REPEAT}. @example BEGIN @var{code} @var{flag} UNTIL @end example @var{code} is executed. The loop is restarted if @code{flag} is false. @example BEGIN @var{code} AGAIN @end example This is an endless loop. @node Counted Loops, Arbitrary control structures, Simple Loops, Control Structures @subsection Counted Loops The basic counted loop is: @example @var{limit} @var{start} ?DO @var{body} LOOP @end example This performs one iteration for every integer, starting from @var{start} and up to, but excluding @var{limit}. The counter, aka index, can be accessed with @code{i}. E.g., the loop @example 10 0 ?DO i . LOOP @end example prints @example 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 @end example The index of the innermost loop can be accessed with @code{i}, the index of the next loop with @code{j}, and the index of the third loop with @code{k}. The loop control data are kept on the return stack, so there are some restrictions on mixing return stack accesses and counted loop words. E.g., if you put values on the return stack outside the loop, you cannot read them inside the loop. If you put values on the return stack within a loop, you have to remove them before the end of the loop and before accessing the index of the loop. There are several variations on the counted loop: @code{LEAVE} leaves the innermost counted loop immediately. @code{LOOP} can be replaced with @code{@var{n} +LOOP}; this updates the index by @var{n} instead of by 1. The loop is terminated when the border between @var{limit-1} and @var{limit} is crossed. E.g.: @code{4 0 ?DO i . 2 +LOOP} prints @code{0 2} @code{4 1 ?DO i . 2 +LOOP} prints @code{1 3} The behaviour of @code{@var{n} +LOOP} is peculiar when @var{n} is negative: @code{-1 0 ?DO i . -1 +LOOP} prints @code{0 -1} @code{ 0 0 ?DO i . -1 +LOOP} prints nothing Therefore we recommend avoiding using @code{@var{n} +LOOP} with negative @var{n}. One alternative is @code{@var{n} S+LOOP}, where the negative case behaves symmetrical to the positive case: @code{-2 0 ?DO i . -1 S+LOOP} prints @code{0 -1} @code{-1 0 ?DO i . -1 S+LOOP} prints @code{0} @code{ 0 0 ?DO i . -1 S+LOOP} prints nothing The loop is terminated when the border between @var{limit@minus{}sgn(n)} and @var{limit} is crossed. However, @code{S+LOOP} is not part of the ANS Forth standard. @code{?DO} can be replaced by @code{DO}. @code{DO} enters the loop even when the start and the limit value are equal. We do not recommend using @code{DO}. It will just give you maintenance troubles. @code{UNLOOP} is used to prepare for an abnormal loop exit, e.g., via @code{EXIT}. @code{UNLOOP} removes the loop control parameters from the return stack so @code{EXIT} can get to its return address. Another counted loop is @example @var{n} FOR @var{body} NEXT @end example This is the preferred loop of native code compiler writers who are too lazy to optimize @code{?DO} loops properly. In GNU Forth, this loop iterates @var{n+1} times; @code{i} produces values starting with @var{n} and ending with 0. Other Forth systems may behave differently, even if they support @code{FOR} loops. @node Arbitrary control structures, Calls and returns, Counted Loops, Control Structures @subsection Arbitrary control structures ANS Forth permits and supports using control structures in a non-nested way. Information about incomplete control structures is stored on the control-flow stack. This stack may be implemented on the Forth data stack, and this is what we have done in gforth. An @i{orig} entry represents an unresolved forward branch, a @i{dest} entry represents a backward branch target. A few words are the basis for building any control structure possible (except control structures that need storage, like calls, coroutines, and backtracking). doc-if doc-ahead doc-then doc-begin doc-until doc-again doc-cs-pick doc-cs-roll On many systems control-flow stack items take one word, in gforth they currently take three (this may change in the future). Therefore it is a really good idea to manipulate the control flow stack with @code{cs-pick} and @code{cs-roll}, not with data stack manipulation words. Some standard control structure words are built from these words: doc-else doc-while doc-repeat Counted loop words constitute a separate group of words: doc-?do doc-do doc-for doc-loop doc-s+loop doc-+loop doc-next doc-leave doc-?leave doc-unloop doc-done The standard does not allow using @code{cs-pick} and @code{cs-roll} on @i{do-sys}. Our system allows it, but it's your job to ensure that for every @code{?DO} etc. there is exactly one @code{UNLOOP} on any path through the definition (@code{LOOP} etc. compile an @code{UNLOOP} on the fall-through path). Also, you have to ensure that all @code{LEAVE}s are resolved (by using one of the loop-ending words or @code{DONE}). Another group of control structure words are doc-case doc-endcase doc-of doc-endof @i{case-sys} and @i{of-sys} cannot be processed using @code{cs-pick} and @code{cs-roll}. @subsubsection Programming Style In order to ensure readability we recommend that you do not create arbitrary control structures directly, but define new control structure words for the control structure you want and use these words in your program. E.g., instead of writing @example begin ... if [ 1 cs-roll ] ... again then @end example we recommend defining control structure words, e.g., @example : while ( dest -- orig dest ) POSTPONE if 1 cs-roll ; immediate : repeat ( orig dest -- ) POSTPONE again POSTPONE then ; immediate @end example and then using these to create the control structure: @example begin ... while ... repeat @end example That's much easier to read, isn't it? Of course, @code{BEGIN} and @code{WHILE} are predefined, so in this example it would not be necessary to define them. @node Calls and returns, Exception Handling, Arbitrary control structures, Control Structures @subsection Calls and returns A definition can be called simply be writing the name of the definition. When the end of the definition is reached, it returns. An earlier return can be forced using doc-exit Don't forget to clean up the return stack and @code{UNLOOP} any outstanding @code{?DO}...@code{LOOP}s before @code{EXIT}ing. The primitive compiled by @code{EXIT} is doc-;s @node Exception Handling, , Calls and returns, Control Structures @subsection Exception Handling doc-catch doc-throw @node Locals, Defining Words, Control Structures, Words @section Locals Local variables can make Forth programming more enjoyable and Forth programs easier to read. Unfortunately, the locals of ANS Forth are laden with restrictions. Therefore, we provide not only the ANS Forth locals wordset, but also our own, more powerful locals wordset (we implemented the ANS Forth locals wordset through our locals wordset). @menu * gforth locals:: * ANS Forth locals:: @end menu @node gforth locals, ANS Forth locals, Locals, Locals @subsection gforth locals Locals can be defined with @example @{ local1 local2 ... -- comment @} @end example or @example @{ local1 local2 ... @} @end example E.g., @example : max @{ n1 n2 -- n3 @} n1 n2 > if n1 else n2 endif ; @end example The similarity of locals definitions with stack comments is intended. A locals definition often replaces the stack comment of a word. The order of the locals corresponds to the order in a stack comment and everything after the @code{--} is really a comment. This similarity has one disadvantage: It is too easy to confuse locals declarations with stack comments, causing bugs and making them hard to find. However, this problem can be avoided by appropriate coding conventions: Do not use both notations in the same program. If you do, they should be distinguished using additional means, e.g. by position. The name of the local may be preceded by a type specifier, e.g., @code{F:} for a floating point value: @example : CX* @{ F: Ar F: Ai F: Br F: Bi -- Cr Ci @} \ complex multiplication Ar Br f* Ai Bi f* f- Ar Bi f* Ai Br f* f+ ; @end example GNU Forth currently supports cells (@code{W:}, @code{W^}), doubles (@code{D:}, @code{D^}), floats (@code{F:}, @code{F^}) and characters (@code{C:}, @code{C^}) in two flavours: a value-flavoured local (defined with @code{W:}, @code{D:} etc.) produces its value and can be changed with @code{TO}. A variable-flavoured local (defined with @code{W^} etc.) produces its address (which becomes invalid when the variable's scope is left). E.g., the standard word @code{emit} can be defined in therms of @code{type} like this: @example : emit @{ C^ char* -- @} char* 1 type ; @end example A local without type specifier is a @code{W:} local. Both flavours of locals are initialized with values from the data or FP stack. Currently there is no way to define locals with user-defined data structures, but we are working on it. GNU Forth allows defining locals everywhere in a colon definition. This poses the following questions: @menu * Where are locals visible by name?:: * How long do locals live?:: * Programming Style:: * Implementation:: @end menu @node Where are locals visible by name?, How long do locals live?, gforth locals, gforth locals @subsubsection Where are locals visible by name? Basically, the answer is that locals are visible where you would expect it in block-structured languages, and sometimes a little longer. If you want to restrict the scope of a local, enclose its definition in @code{SCOPE}...@code{ENDSCOPE}. doc-scope doc-endscope These words behave like control structure words, so you can use them with @code{CS-PICK} and @code{CS-ROLL} to restrict the scope in arbitrary ways. If you want a more exact answer to the visibility question, here's the basic principle: A local is visible in all places that can only be reached through the definition of the local@footnote{In compiler construction terminology, all places dominated by the definition of the local.}. In other words, it is not visible in places that can be reached without going through the definition of the local. E.g., locals defined in @code{IF}...@code{ENDIF} are visible until the @code{ENDIF}, locals defined in @code{BEGIN}...@code{UNTIL} are visible after the @code{UNTIL} (until, e.g., a subsequent @code{ENDSCOPE}). The reasoning behind this solution is: We want to have the locals visible as long as it is meaningful. The user can always make the visibility shorter by using explicit scoping. In a place that can only be reached through the definition of a local, the meaning of a local name is clear. In other places it is not: How is the local initialized at the control flow path that does not contain the definition? Which local is meant, if the same name is defined twice in two independent control flow paths? This should be enough detail for nearly all users, so you can skip the rest of this section. If you relly must know all the gory details and options, read on. In order to implement this rule, the compiler has to know which places are unreachable. It knows this automatically after @code{AHEAD}, @code{AGAIN}, @code{EXIT} and @code{LEAVE}; in other cases (e.g., after most @code{THROW}s), you can use the word @code{UNREACHABLE} to tell the compiler that the control flow never reaches that place. If @code{UNREACHABLE} is not used where it could, the only consequence is that the visibility of some locals is more limited than the rule above says. If @code{UNREACHABLE} is used where it should not (i.e., if you lie to the compiler), buggy code will be produced. Another problem with this rule is that at @code{BEGIN}, the compiler does not know which locals will be visible on the incoming back-edge. All problems discussed in the following are due to this ignorance of the compiler (we discuss the problems using @code{BEGIN} loops as examples; the discussion also applies to @code{?DO} and other loops). Perhaps the most insidious example is: @example AHEAD BEGIN x [ 1 CS-ROLL ] THEN @{ x @} ... UNTIL @end example This should be legal according to the visibility rule. The use of @code{x} can only be reached through the definition; but that appears textually below the use. From this example it is clear that the visibility rules cannot be fully implemented without major headaches. Our implementation treats common cases as advertised and the exceptions are treated in a safe way: The compiler makes a reasonable guess about the locals visible after a @code{BEGIN}; if it is too pessimistic, the user will get a spurious error about the local not being defined; if the compiler is too optimistic, it will notice this later and issue a warning. In the case above the compiler would complain about @code{x} being undefined at its use. You can see from the obscure examples in this section that it takes quite unusual control structures to get the compiler into trouble, and even then it will often do fine. If the @code{BEGIN} is reachable from above, the most optimistic guess is that all locals visible before the @code{BEGIN} will also be visible after the @code{BEGIN}. This guess is valid for all loops that are entered only through the @code{BEGIN}, in particular, for normal @code{BEGIN}...@code{WHILE}...@code{REPEAT} and @code{BEGIN}...@code{UNTIL} loops and it is implemented in our compiler. When the branch to the @code{BEGIN} is finally generated by @code{AGAIN} or @code{UNTIL}, the compiler checks the guess and warns the user if it was too optimisitic: @example IF @{ x @} BEGIN \ x ? [ 1 cs-roll ] THEN ... UNTIL @end example Here, @code{x} lives only until the @code{BEGIN}, but the compiler optimistically assumes that it lives until the @code{THEN}. It notices this difference when it compiles the @code{UNTIL} and issues a warning. The user can avoid the warning, and make sure that @code{x} is not used in the wrong area by using explicit scoping: @example IF SCOPE @{ x @} ENDSCOPE BEGIN [ 1 cs-roll ] THEN ... UNTIL @end example Since the guess is optimistic, there will be no spurious error messages about undefined locals. If the @code{BEGIN} is not reachable from above (e.g., after @code{AHEAD} or @code{EXIT}), the compiler cannot even make an optimistic guess, as the locals visible after the @code{BEGIN} may be defined later. Therefore, the compiler assumes that no locals are visible after the @code{BEGIN}. However, the useer can use @code{ASSUME-LIVE} to make the compiler assume that the same locals are visible at the BEGIN as at the point where the item was created. doc-assume-live E.g., @example @{ x @} AHEAD ASSUME-LIVE BEGIN x [ 1 CS-ROLL ] THEN ... UNTIL @end example Other cases where the locals are defined before the @code{BEGIN} can be handled by inserting an appropriate @code{CS-ROLL} before the @code{ASSUME-LIVE} (and changing the control-flow stack manipulation behind the @code{ASSUME-LIVE}). Cases where locals are defined after the @code{BEGIN} (but should be visible immediately after the @code{BEGIN}) can only be handled by rearranging the loop. E.g., the ``most insidious'' example above can be arranged into: @example BEGIN @{ x @} ... 0= WHILE x REPEAT @end example @node How long do locals live?, Programming Style, Where are locals visible by name?, gforth locals @subsubsection How long do locals live? The right answer for the lifetime question would be: A local lives at least as long as it can be accessed. For a value-flavoured local this means: until the end of its visibility. However, a variable-flavoured local could be accessed through its address far beyond its visibility scope. Ultimately, this would mean that such locals would have to be garbage collected. Since this entails un-Forth-like implementation complexities, I adopted the same cowardly solution as some other languages (e.g., C): The local lives only as long as it is visible; afterwards its address is invalid (and programs that access it afterwards are erroneous). @node Programming Style, Implementation, How long do locals live?, gforth locals @subsubsection Programming Style The freedom to define locals anywhere has the potential to change programming styles dramatically. In particular, the need to use the return stack for intermediate storage vanishes. Moreover, all stack manipulations (except @code{PICK}s and @code{ROLL}s with run-time determined arguments) can be eliminated: If the stack items are in the wrong order, just write a locals definition for all of them; then write the items in the order you want. This seems a little far-fetched and eliminating stack manipulations is unlikely to become a conscious programming objective. Still, the number of stack manipulations will be reduced dramatically if local variables are used liberally (e.g., compare @code{max} in @ref{gforth locals} with a traditional implementation of @code{max}). This shows one potential benefit of locals: making Forth programs more readable. Of course, this benefit will only be realized if the programmers continue to honour the principle of factoring instead of using the added latitude to make the words longer. Using @code{TO} can and should be avoided. Without @code{TO}, every value-flavoured local has only a single assignment and many advantages of functional languages apply to Forth. I.e., programs are easier to analyse, to optimize and to read: It is clear from the definition what the local stands for, it does not turn into something different later. E.g., a definition using @code{TO} might look like this: @example : strcmp @{ addr1 u1 addr2 u2 -- n @} u1 u2 min 0 ?do addr1 c@ addr2 c@ - ?dup if unloop exit then addr1 char+ TO addr1 addr2 char+ TO addr2 loop u1 u2 - ; @end example Here, @code{TO} is used to update @code{addr1} and @code{addr2} at every loop iteration. @code{strcmp} is a typical example of the readability problems of using @code{TO}. When you start reading @code{strcmp}, you think that @code{addr1} refers to the start of the string. Only near the end of the loop you realize that it is something else. This can be avoided by defining two locals at the start of the loop that are initialized with the right value for the current iteration. @example : strcmp @{ addr1 u1 addr2 u2 -- n @} addr1 addr2 u1 u2 min 0 ?do @{ s1 s2 @} s1 c@ s2 c@ - ?dup if unloop exit then s1 char+ s2 char+ loop 2drop u1 u2 - ; @end example Here it is clear from the start that @code{s1} has a different value in every loop iteration. @node Implementation, , Programming Style, gforth locals @subsubsection Implementation GNU Forth uses an extra locals stack. The most compelling reason for this is that the return stack is not float-aligned; using an extra stack also eliminates the problems and restrictions of using the return stack as locals stack. Like the other stacks, the locals stack grows toward lower addresses. A few primitives allow an efficient implementation: doc-@local# doc-f@local# doc-laddr# doc-lp+!# doc-lp! doc->l doc-f>l In addition to these primitives, some specializations of these primitives for commonly occurring inline arguments are provided for efficiency reasons, e.g., @code{@@local0} as specialization of @code{@@local#} for the inline argument 0. The following compiling words compile the right specialized version, or the general version, as appropriate: doc-compile-@local doc-compile-f@local doc-compile-lp+! Combinations of conditional branches and @code{lp+!#} like @code{?branch-lp+!#} (the locals pointer is only changed if the branch is taken) are provided for efficiency and correctness in loops. A special area in the dictionary space is reserved for keeping the local variable names. @code{@{} switches the dictionary pointer to this area and @code{@}} switches it back and generates the locals initializing code. @code{W:} etc.@ are normal defining words. This special area is cleared at the start of every colon definition. A special feature of GNU Forths dictionary is used to implement the definition of locals without type specifiers: every wordlist (aka vocabulary) has its own methods for searching etc. (@pxref{Wordlists}). For the present purpose we defined a wordlist with a special search method: When it is searched for a word, it actually creates that word using @code{W:}. @code{@{} changes the search order to first search the wordlist containing @code{@}}, @code{W:} etc., and then the wordlist for defining locals without type specifiers. The lifetime rules support a stack discipline within a colon definition: The lifetime of a local is either nested with other locals lifetimes or it does not overlap them. At @code{BEGIN}, @code{IF}, and @code{AHEAD} no code for locals stack pointer manipulation is generated. Between control structure words locals definitions can push locals onto the locals stack. @code{AGAIN} is the simplest of the other three control flow words. It has to restore the locals stack depth of the corresponding @code{BEGIN} before branching. The code looks like this: @format @code{lp+!#} current-locals-size @minus{} dest-locals-size @code{branch} @end format @code{UNTIL} is a little more complicated: If it branches back, it must adjust the stack just like @code{AGAIN}. But if it falls through, the locals stack must not be changed. The compiler generates the following code: @format @code{?branch-lp+!#} current-locals-size @minus{} dest-locals-size @end format The locals stack pointer is only adjusted if the branch is taken. @code{THEN} can produce somewhat inefficient code: @format @code{lp+!#} current-locals-size @minus{} orig-locals-size : @code{lp+!#} orig-locals-size @minus{} new-locals-size @end format The second @code{lp+!#} adjusts the locals stack pointer from the level at the @var{orig} point to the level after the @code{THEN}. The first @code{lp+!#} adjusts the locals stack pointer from the current level to the level at the orig point, so the complete effect is an adjustment from the current level to the right level after the @code{THEN}. In a conventional Forth implementation a dest control-flow stack entry is just the target address and an orig entry is just the address to be patched. Our locals implementation adds a wordlist to every orig or dest item. It is the list of locals visible (or assumed visible) at the point described by the entry. Our implementation also adds a tag to identify the kind of entry, in particular to differentiate between live and dead (reachable and unreachable) orig entries. A few unusual operations have to be performed on locals wordlists: doc-common-list doc-sub-list? doc-list-size Several features of our locals wordlist implementation make these operations easy to implement: The locals wordlists are organised as linked lists; the tails of these lists are shared, if the lists contain some of the same locals; and the address of a name is greater than the address of the names behind it in the list. Another important implementation detail is the variable @code{dead-code}. It is used by @code{BEGIN} and @code{THEN} to determine if they can be reached directly or only through the branch that they resolve. @code{dead-code} is set by @code{UNREACHABLE}, @code{AHEAD}, @code{EXIT} etc., and cleared at the start of a colon definition, by @code{BEGIN} and usually by @code{THEN}. Counted loops are similar to other loops in most respects, but @code{LEAVE} requires special attention: It performs basically the same service as @code{AHEAD}, but it does not create a control-flow stack entry. Therefore the information has to be stored elsewhere; traditionally, the information was stored in the target fields of the branches created by the @code{LEAVE}s, by organizing these fields into a linked list. Unfortunately, this clever trick does not provide enough space for storing our extended control flow information. Therefore, we introduce another stack, the leave stack. It contains the control-flow stack entries for all unresolved @code{LEAVE}s. Local names are kept until the end of the colon definition, even if they are no longer visible in any control-flow path. In a few cases this may lead to increased space needs for the locals name area, but usually less than reclaiming this space would cost in code size. @node ANS Forth locals, , gforth locals, Locals @subsection ANS Forth locals The ANS Forth locals wordset does not define a syntax for locals, but words that make it possible to define various syntaxes. One of the possible syntaxes is a subset of the syntax we used in the gforth locals wordset, i.e.: @example @{ local1 local2 ... -- comment @} @end example or @example @{ local1 local2 ... @} @end example The order of the locals corresponds to the order in a stack comment. The restrictions are: @itemize @bullet @item Locals can only be cell-sized values (no type specifers are allowed). @item Locals can be defined only outside control structures. @item Locals can interfere with explicit usage of the return stack. For the exact (and long) rules, see the standard. If you don't use return stack accessing words in a definition using locals, you will we all right. The purpose of this rule is to make locals implementation on the return stack easier. @item The whole definition must be in one line. @end itemize Locals defined in this way behave like @code{VALUE}s (@xref{Values}). I.e., they are initialized from the stack. Using their name produces their value. Their value can be changed using @code{TO}. Since this syntax is supported by gforth directly, you need not do anything to use it. If you want to port a program using this syntax to another ANS Forth system, use @file{anslocal.fs} to implement the syntax on the other system. Note that a syntax shown in the standard, section A.13 looks similar, but is quite different in having the order of locals reversed. Beware! The ANS Forth locals wordset itself consists of the following word doc-(local) The ANS Forth locals extension wordset defines a syntax, but it is so awful that we strongly recommend not to use it. We have implemented this syntax to make porting to gforth easy, but do not document it here. The problem with this syntax is that the locals are defined in an order reversed with respect to the standard stack comment notation, making programs harder to read, and easier to misread and miswrite. The only merit of this syntax is that it is easy to implement using the ANS Forth locals wordset. @node Defining Words, Wordlists, Locals, Words @section Defining Words @menu * Values:: @end menu @node Values, , Defining Words, Defining Words @subsection Values @node Wordlists, Files, Defining Words, Words @section Wordlists @node Files, Blocks, Wordlists, Words @section Files @node Blocks, Other I/O, Files, Words @section Blocks @node Other I/O, Programming Tools, Blocks, Words @section Other I/O @node Programming Tools, Threading Words, Other I/O, Words @section Programming Tools @menu * Debugging:: Simple and quick. * Assertions:: Making your programs self-checking. @end menu @node Debugging, Assertions, Programming Tools, Programming Tools @subsection Debugging The simple debugging aids provided in @file{debugging.fs} are meant to support a different style of debugging than the tracing/stepping debuggers used in languages with long turn-around times. A much better (faster) way in fast-compilig languages is to add printing code at well-selected places, let the program run, look at the output, see where things went wrong, add more printing code, etc., until the bug is found. The word @code{~~} is easy to insert. It just prints debugging information (by default the source location and the stack contents). It is also easy to remove (@kbd{C-x ~} in the Emacs Forth mode to query-replace them with nothing). The deferred words @code{printdebugdata} and @code{printdebugline} control the output of @code{~~}. The default source location output format works well with Emacs' compilation mode, so you can step through the program at the source level using @kbd{C-x `} (the advantage over a stepping debugger is that you can step in any direction and you know where the crash has happened or where the strange data has occurred). Note that the default actions clobber the contents of the pictured numeric output string, so you should not use @code{~~}, e.g., between @code{<#} and @code{#>}. doc-~~ doc-printdebugdata doc-printdebugline @node Assertions, , Debugging, Programming Tools @subsection Assertions It is a good idea to make your programs self-checking, in particular, if you use an assumption (e.g., that a certain field of a data structure is never zero) that may become wrong during maintenance. GForth supports assertions for this purpose. They are used like this: @example assert( @var{flag} ) @end example The code between @code{assert(} and @code{)} should compute a flag, that should be true if everything is alright and false otherwise. It should not change anything else on the stack. The overall stack effect of the assertion is @code{( -- )}. E.g. @example assert( 1 1 + 2 = ) \ what we learn in school assert( dup 0<> ) \ assert that the top of stack is not zero assert( false ) \ this code should not be reached @end example The need for assertions is different at different times. During debugging, we want more checking, in production we sometimes care more for speed. Therefore, assertions can be turned off, i.e., the assertion becomes a comment. Depending on the importance of an assertion and the time it takes to check it, you may want to turn off some assertions and keep others turned on. GForth provides several levels of assertions for this purpose: doc-assert0( doc-assert1( doc-assert2( doc-assert3( doc-assert( doc-) @code{Assert(} is the same as @code{assert1(}. The variable @code{assert-level} specifies the highest assertions that are turned on. I.e., at the default @code{assert-level} of one, @code{assert0(} and @code{assert1(} assertions perform checking, while @code{assert2(} and @code{assert3(} assertions are treated as comments. Note that the @code{assert-level} is evaluated at compile-time, not at run-time. I.e., you cannot turn assertions on or off at run-time, you have to set the @code{assert-level} appropriately before compiling a piece of code. You can compile several pieces of code at several @code{assert-level}s (e.g., a trusted library at level 1 and newly written code at level 3). doc-assert-level If an assertion fails, a message compatible with Emacs' compilation mode is produced and the execution is aborted (currently with @code{ABORT"}. If there is interest, we will introduce a special throw code. But if you intend to @code{catch} a specific condition, using @code{throw} is probably more appropriate than an assertion). @node Threading Words, , Programming Tools, Words @section Threading Words These words provide access to code addresses and other threading stuff in gforth (and, possibly, other interpretive Forths). It more or less abstracts away the differences between direct and indirect threading (and, for direct threading, the machine dependences). However, at present this wordset is still inclomplete. It is also pretty low-level; some day it will hopefully be made unnecessary by an internals words set that abstracts implementation details away completely. doc->code-address doc->does-code doc-code-address! doc-does-code! doc-does-handler! doc-/does-handler @node ANS conformance, Model, Words, Top @chapter ANS conformance ANS Forth systems are required to document certain implementation choices. This chapter tries to meet these requirements. In many cases it gives a way to ask the system for the information instead of providing the information directly, in particular, if the information depends on the processor, the operating system or the installation options chosen, or if they are likely to change during the maintenance of gforth. @comment The framework for the rest has been taken from pfe. @menu * The Core Words:: * The optional Block word set:: * The optional Double Number word set:: * The optional Exception word set:: * The optional Facility word set:: * The optional File-Access word set:: * The optional Floating-Point word set:: * The optional Locals word set:: * The optional Memory-Allocation word set:: * The optional Programming-Tools word set:: * The optional Search-Order word set:: * The optional String word set:: @end menu @c ===================================================================== @node The Core Words, The optional Block word set, ANS conformance, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section The Core Words @c ===================================================================== @menu * core-idef:: * core-ambcond:: * core-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node core-idef, core-ambcond, The Core Words, The Core Words @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item (Cell) aligned addresses: processor-dependent. Gforths alignment words perform natural alignment (e.g., an address aligned for a datum of size 8 is divisible by 8). Unaligned accesses usually result in a @code{-23 THROW}. @item @code{EMIT} and non-graphic characters: The character is output using the C library function (actually, macro) @code{putchar}. @item character editing of @code{ACCEPT} and @code{EXPECT}: This is modeled on the GNU readline library (@pxref{Readline Interaction, , Command Line Editing, readline, The GNU Readline Library}) with Emacs-like key bindings. @kbd{Tab} deviates a little by producing a full word completion every time you type it (instead of producing the common prefix of all completions). @item character set: The character set of your computer and display device. Gforth is 8-bit-clean (but some other component in your system may make trouble). @item Character-aligned address requirements: installation-dependent. Currently a character is represented by a C @code{unsigned char}; in the future we might switch to @code{wchar_t} (Comments on that requested). @item character-set extensions and matching of names: Any character except 0 can be used in a name. Matching is case-insensitive. The matching is performed using the C function @code{strncasecmp}, whose function is probably influenced by the locale. E.g., the @code{C} locale does not know about accents and umlauts, so they are matched case-sensitively in that locale. For portability reasons it is best to write programs such that they work in the @code{C} locale. Then one can use libraries written by a Polish programmer (who might use words containing ISO Latin-2 encoded characters) and by a French programmer (ISO Latin-1) in the same program (of course, @code{WORDS} will produce funny results for some of the words (which ones, depends on the font you are using)). Also, the locale you prefer may not be available in other operating systems. Hopefully, Unicode will solve these problems one day. @item conditions under which control characters match a space delimiter: If @code{WORD} is called with the space character as a delimiter, all white-space characters (as identified by the C macro @code{isspace()}) are delimiters. @code{PARSE}, on the other hand, treats space like other delimiters. @code{PARSE-WORD} treats space like @code{WORD}, but behaves like @code{PARSE} otherwise. @code{(NAME)}, which is used by the outer interpreter (aka text interpreter) by default, treats all white-space characters as delimiters. @item format of the control flow stack: The data stack is used as control flow stack. The size of a control flow stack item in cells is given by the constant @code{cs-item-size}. At the time of this writing, an item consists of a (pointer to a) locals list (third), an address in the code (second), and a tag for identifying the item (TOS). The following tags are used: @code{defstart}, @code{live-orig}, @code{dead-orig}, @code{dest}, @code{do-dest}, @code{scopestart}. @item conversion of digits > 35 The characters @code{[\]^_'} are the digits with the decimal value 36@minus{}41. There is no way to input many of the larger digits. @item display after input terminates in @code{ACCEPT} and @code{EXPECT}: The cursor is moved to the end of the entered string. If the input is terminated using the @kbd{Return} key, a space is typed. @item exception abort sequence of @code{ABORT"}: The error string is stored into the variable @code{"error} and a @code{-2 throw} is performed. @item input line terminator: For interactive input, @kbd{C-m} and @kbd{C-j} terminate lines. One of these characters is typically produced when you type the @kbd{Enter} or @kbd{Return} key. @item maximum size of a counted string: @code{s" /counted-string" environment? drop .}. Currently 255 characters on all ports, but this may change. @item maximum size of a parsed string: Given by the constant @code{/line}. Currently 255 characters. @item maximum size of a definition name, in characters: 31 @item maximum string length for @code{ENVIRONMENT?}, in characters: 31 @item method of selecting the user input device: The user input device is the standard input. There is current no way to change it from within gforth. However, the input can typically be redirected in the command line that starts gforth. @item method of selecting the user output device: The user output device is the standard output. It cannot be redirected from within gforth, but typically from the command line that starts gforth. Gforth uses buffered output, so output on a terminal does not become visible before the next newline or buffer overflow. Output on non-terminals is invisible until the buffer overflows. @item methods of dictionary compilation: Waht are we expected to document here? @item number of bits in one address unit: @code{s" address-units-bits" environment? drop .}. 8 in all current ports. @item number representation and arithmetic: Processor-dependent. Binary two's complement on all current ports. @item ranges for integer types: Installation-dependent. Make environmental queries for @code{MAX-N}, @code{MAX-U}, @code{MAX-D} and @code{MAX-UD}. The lower bounds for unsigned (and positive) types is 0. The lower bound for signed types on two's complement and one's complement machines machines can be computed by adding 1 to the upper bound. @item read-only data space regions: The whole Forth data space is writable. @item size of buffer at @code{WORD}: @code{PAD HERE - .}. 104 characters on 32-bit machines. The buffer is shared with the pictured numeric output string. If overwriting @code{PAD} is acceptable, it is as large as the remaining dictionary space, although only as much can be sensibly used as fits in a counted string. @item size of one cell in address units: @code{1 cells .}. @item size of one character in address units: @code{1 chars .}. 1 on all current ports. @item size of the keyboard terminal buffer: Varies. You can determine the size at a specific time using @code{lp@ tib - .}. It is shared with the locals stack and TIBs of files that include the current file. You can change the amount of space for TIBs and locals stack at gforth startup with the command line option @code{-l}. @item size of the pictured numeric output buffer: @code{PAD HERE - .}. 104 characters on 32-bit machines. The buffer is shared with @code{WORD}. @item size of the scratch area returned by @code{PAD}: The remainder of dictionary space. You can even use the unused part of the data stack space. The current size can be computed with @code{sp@ pad - .}. @item system case-sensitivity characteristics: Dictionary searches are case insensitive. However, as explained above under @i{character-set extensions}, the matching for non-ASCII characters is determined by the locale you are using. In the default @code{C} locale all non-ASCII characters are matched case-sensitively. @item system prompt: @code{ ok} in interpret state, @code{ compiled} in compile state. @item division rounding: installation dependent. @code{s" floored" environment? drop .}. We leave the choice to gcc (what to use for @code{/}) and to you (whether to use @code{fm/mod}, @code{sm/rem} or simply @code{/}). @item values of @code{STATE} when true: -1. @item values returned after arithmetic overflow: On two's complement machines, arithmetic is performed modulo 2**bits-per-cell for single arithmetic and 4**bits-per-cell for double arithmetic (with appropriate mapping for signed types). Division by zero typically results in a @code{-55 throw} (floatingpoint unidentified fault), although a @code{-10 throw} (divide by zero) would be more appropriate. @item whether the current definition can be found after @t{DOES>}: No. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node core-ambcond, core-other, core-idef, The Core Words @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item a name is neither a word nor a number: @code{-13 throw} (Undefined word) @item a definition name exceeds the maximum length allowed: @code{-19 throw} (Word name too long) @item addressing a region not inside the various data spaces of the forth system: The stacks, code space and name space are accessible. Machine code space is typically readable. Accessing other addresses gives results dependent on the operating system. On decent systems: @code{-9 throw} (Invalid memory address). @item argument type incompatible with parameter: This is usually not caught. Some words perform checks, e.g., the control flow words, and issue a @code{ABORT"} or @code{-12 THROW} (Argument type mismatch). @item attempting to obtain the execution token of a word with undefined execution semantics: You get an execution token representing the compilation semantics instead. @item dividing by zero: typically results in a @code{-55 throw} (floating point unidentified fault), although a @code{-10 throw} (divide by zero) would be more appropriate. @item insufficient data stack or return stack space: Not checked. This typically results in mysterious illegal memory accesses, producing @code{-9 throw} (Invalid memory address) or @code{-23 throw} (Address alignment exception). @item insufficient space for loop control parameters: like other return stack overflows. @item insufficient space in the dictionary: Not checked. Similar results as stack overflows. However, typically the error appears at a different place when one inserts or removes code. @item interpreting a word with undefined interpretation semantics: For some words, we defined interpretation semantics. For the others: @code{-14 throw} (Interpreting a compile-only word). Note that this is checked only by the outer (aka text) interpreter; if the word is @code{execute}d in some other way, it will typically perform it's compilation semantics even in interpret state. (We could change @code{'} and relatives not to give the xt of such words, but we think that would be too restrictive). @item modifying the contents of the input buffer or a string literal: These are located in writable memory and can be modified. @item overflow of the pictured numeric output string: Not checked. @item parsed string overflow: @code{PARSE} cannot overflow. @code{WORD} does not check for overflow. @item producing a result out of range: On two's complement machines, arithmetic is performed modulo 2**bits-per-cell for single arithmetic and 4**bits-per-cell for double arithmetic (with appropriate mapping for signed types). Division by zero typically results in a @code{-55 throw} (floatingpoint unidentified fault), although a @code{-10 throw} (divide by zero) would be more appropriate. @code{convert} and @code{>number} currently overflow silently. @item reading from an empty data or return stack: The data stack is checked by the outer (aka text) interpreter after every word executed. If it has underflowed, a @code{-4 throw} (Stack underflow) is performed. Apart from that, the stacks are not checked and underflows can result in similar behaviour as overflows (of adjacent stacks). @item unexepected end of the input buffer, resulting in an attempt to use a zero-length string as a name: @code{Create} and its descendants perform a @code{-16 throw} (Attempt to use zero-length string as a name). Words like @code{'} probably will not find what they search. Note that it is possible to create zero-length names with @code{nextname} (should it not?). @item @code{>IN} greater than input buffer: The next invocation of a parsing word returns a string wih length 0. @item @code{RECURSE} appears after @code{DOES>}: Compiles a recursive call to the defining word not to the defined word. @item argument input source different than current input source for @code{RESTORE-INPUT}: !!???If the argument input source is a valid input source then it gets restored. Otherwise causes @code{-12 THROW} which unless caught issues the message "argument type mismatch" and aborts. @item data space containing definitions gets de-allocated: Deallocation with @code{allot} is not checked. This typically resuls in memory access faults or execution of illegal instructions. @item data space read/write with incorrect alignment: Processor-dependent. Typically results in a @code{-23 throw} (Address alignment exception). Under Linux on a 486 or later processor with alignment turned on, incorrect alignment results in a @code{-9 throw} (Invalid memory address). There are reportedly some processors with alignment restrictions that do not report them. @item data space pointer not properly aligned, @code{,}, @code{C,}: Like other alignment errors. @item less than u+2 stack items (@code{PICK} and @code{ROLL}): Not checked. May cause an illegal memory access. @item loop control parameters not available: Not checked. The counted loop words simply assume that the top of return stack items are loop control parameters and behave accordingly. @item most recent definition does not have a name (@code{IMMEDIATE}): @code{abort" last word was headerless"}. @item name not defined by @code{VALUE} used by @code{TO}: @code{-32 throw} (Invalid name argument) @item name not found (@code{'}, @code{POSTPONE}, @code{[']}, @code{[COMPILE]}: @code{-13 throw} (Undefined word) @item parameters are not of the same type (@code{DO}, @code{?DO}, @code{WITHIN}): Gforth behaves as if they were of the same type. I.e., you can predict the behaviour by interpreting all parameters as, e.g., signed. @item @code{POSTPONE} or @code{[COMPILE]} applied to @code{TO}: Assume @code{: X POSTPONE TO ; IMMEDIATE}. @code{X} is equivalent to @code{TO}. @item String longer than a counted string returned by @code{WORD}: Not checked. The string will be ok, but the count will, of course, contain only the least significant bits of the length. @item u greater than or equal to the number of bits in a cell (@code{LSHIFT}, @code{RSHIFT}: Processor-dependent. Typical behaviours are returning 0 and using only the low bits of the shift count. @item word not defined via @code{CREATE}: @code{>BODY} produces the PFA of the word no matter how it was defined. @code{DOES>} changes the execution semantics of the last defined word no matter how it was defined. E.g., @code{CONSTANT DOES>} is equivalent to @code{CREATE , DOES>}. @item words improperly used outside @code{<#} and @code{#>}: Not checked. As usual, you can expect memory faults. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node core-other, , core-ambcond, The Core Words @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item nonstandard words using @code{PAD}: None. @item operator's terminal facilities available: !!?? @item program data space available: @code{sp@ here - .} gives the space remaining for dictionary and data stack together. @item return stack space available: !!?? @item stack space available: @code{sp@ here - .} gives the space remaining for dictionary and data stack together. @item system dictionary space required, in address units: Type @code{here forthstart - .} after startup. At the time of this writing, this gives 70108 (bytes) on a 32-bit system. @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Block word set, The optional Double Number word set, The Core Words, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section The optional Block word set @c ===================================================================== @menu * block-idef:: * block-ambcond:: * block-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node block-idef, block-ambcond, The optional Block word set, The optional Block word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item the format for display by @code{LIST}: First the screen number is displayed, then 16 lines of 64 characters, each line preceded by the line number. @item the length of a line affected by @code{\}: 64 characters. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node block-ambcond, block-other, block-idef, The optional Block word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item correct block read was not possible: Typically results in a @code{throw} of some OS-derived value (between -512 and -2048). If the blocks file was just not long enough, blanks are supplied for the missing portion. @item I/O exception in block transfer: Typically results in a @code{throw} of some OS-derived value (between -512 and -2048). @item invalid block number: @code{-35 throw} (Invalid block number) @item a program directly alters the contents of @code{BLK}: The input stream is switched to that other block, at the same position. If the storing to @code{BLK} happens when interpreting non-block input, the system will get quite confused when the block ends. @item no current block buffer for @code{UPDATE}: @code{UPDATE} has no effect. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node block-other, , block-ambcond, The optional Block word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item any restrictions a multiprogramming system places on the use of buffer addresses: No restrictions (yet). @item the number of blocks available for source and data: depends on your disk space. @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Double Number word set, The optional Exception word set, The optional Block word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section The optional Double Number word set @c ===================================================================== @menu * double-idef:: * double-ambcond:: * double-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node double-idef, double-ambcond, The optional Double Number word set, The optional Double Number word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional documentation requirements. @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node double-ambcond, double-other, double-idef, The optional Double Number word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @var{d} outside of range on @var{n} in @code{D>S}: The least significant cell of @var{d} is produced. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node double-other, , double-ambcond, The optional Double Number word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional documentation requirements. @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Exception word set, The optional Facility word set, The optional Double Number word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section The optional Exception word set @c ===================================================================== @menu * exception-idef:: * exception-ambcond:: * exception-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node exception-idef, exception-ambcond, The optional Exception word set, The optional Exception word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @code{THROW}-codes used in the system: The codes -256@minus{}-511 are used for reporting signals (see @file{errore.fs}). The codes -512@minus{}-2047 are used for OS errors (for file and memory allocation operations). The mapping from OS error numbers to throw code is -512@minus{}@var{errno}. One side effect of this mapping is that undefined OS errors produce a message with a strange number; e.g., @code{-1000 THROW} results in @code{Unknown error 488} on my system. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node exception-ambcond, exception-other, exception-idef, The optional Exception word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional documentation requirements. @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node exception-other, , exception-ambcond, The optional Exception word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional documentation requirements. @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Facility word set, The optional File-Access word set, The optional Exception word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section The optional Facility word set @c ===================================================================== @menu * facility-idef:: * facility-ambcond:: * facility-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node facility-idef, facility-ambcond, The optional Facility word set, The optional Facility word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item encoding of keyboard events (@code{EKEY}): Not yet implemeted. @item duration of a system clock tick System dependent. With respect to @code{MS}, the time is specified in microseconds. How well the OS and the hardware implement this, is another question. @item repeatability to be expected from the execution of @code{MS}: System dependent. On Unix, a lot depends on load. If the system is lightly loaded, and the delay is short enough that gforth does not get swapped out, the performance should be acceptable. Under MS-DOS and other single-tasking systems, it should be good. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node facility-ambcond, facility-other, facility-idef, The optional Facility word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @code{AT-XY} can't be performed on user output device: Largely terminal dependant. No range checks are done on the arguments. No errors are reported. You may see some garbage appearing, you may see simply nothing happen. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node facility-other, , facility-ambcond, The optional Facility word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- No additional documentation requirements. @c ===================================================================== @node The optional File-Access word set, The optional Floating-Point word set, The optional Facility word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section The optional File-Access word set @c ===================================================================== @menu * file-idef:: * file-ambcond:: * file-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node file-idef, file-ambcond, The optional File-Access word set, The optional File-Access word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item File access methods used: @code{R/O}, @code{R/W} and @code{BIN} work as you would expect. @code{W/O} translates into the C file opening mode @code{w} (or @code{wb}): The file is cleared, if it exists, and created, if it does not (both with @code{open-file} and @code{create-file}. Under Unix @code{create-file} creates a file with 666 permissions modified by your umask. @item file exceptions: The file words do not raise exceptions (except, perhaps, memory access faults when you pass illegal addresses or file-ids). @item file line terminator: System-dependent. Gforth uses C's newline character as line terminator. What the actual character code(s) of this are is system-dependent. @item file name format System dependent. Gforth just uses the file name format of your OS. @item information returned by @code{FILE-STATUS}: @code{FILE-STATUS} returns the most powerful file access mode allowed for the file: Either @code{R/O}, @code{W/O} or @code{R/W}. If the file cannot be accessed, @code{R/O BIN} is returned. @code{BIN} is applicable along with the retured mode. @item input file state after an exception when including source: All files that are left via the exception are closed. @item @var{ior} values and meaning: The @var{ior}s returned by the file words are intended as throw codes. They typically are in the range -512@minus{}-2047 of OS errors. The mapping from OS error numbers to @var{ior}s is -512@minus{}@var{errno}. @item maximum depth of file input nesting: limited by the amount of return stack, locals/TIB stack, and the number of open files available. This should not give you troubles. @item maximum size of input line: @code{/line}. Currently 255. @item methods of mapping block ranges to files: Currently, the block words automatically access the file @file{blocks.fb} in the currend working directory. More sophisticated methods could be implemented if there is demand (and a volunteer). @item number of string buffers provided by @code{S"}: 1 @item size of string buffer used by @code{S"}: @code{/line}. currently 255. @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node file-ambcond, file-other, file-idef, The optional File-Access word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item attempting to position a file outside it's boundaries: @code{REPOSITION-FILE} is performed as usual: Afterwards, @code{FILE-POSITION} returns the value given to @code{REPOSITION-FILE}. @item attempting to read from file positions not yet written: End-of-file, i.e., zero characters are read and no error is reported. @item @var{file-id} is invalid (@code{INCLUDE-FILE}): An appropriate exception may be thrown, but a memory fault or other problem is more probable. @item I/O exception reading or closing @var{file-id} (@code{include-file}, @code{included}): The @var{ior} produced by the operation, that discovered the problem, is thrown. @item named file cannot be opened (@code{included}): The @var{ior} produced by @code{open-file} is thrown. @item requesting an unmapped block number: There are no unmapped legal block numbers. On some operating systems, writing a block with a large number may overflow the file system and have an error message as consequence. @item using @code{source-id} when @code{blk} is non-zero: @code{source-id} performs its function. Typically it will give the id of the source which loaded the block. (Better ideas?) @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node file-other, , file-ambcond, The optional File-Access word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Floating-Point word set, The optional Locals word set, The optional File-Access word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section @c ===================================================================== @menu * floating-idef:: floating-ambcond:: floating-other:: * floating-ambcond:: * floating-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node floating-idef, floating-ambcond, The optional Floating-Point word set, The optional Floating-Point word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node floating-ambcond, floating-other, floating-idef, The optional Floating-Point word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node floating-other, , floating-ambcond, The optional Floating-Point word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Locals word set, The optional Memory-Allocation word set, The optional Floating-Point word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section @c ===================================================================== @menu * locals-idef:: * locals-ambcond:: * locals-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node locals-idef, locals-ambcond, The optional Locals word set, The optional Locals word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node locals-ambcond, locals-other, locals-idef, The optional Locals word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node locals-other, , locals-ambcond, The optional Locals word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Memory-Allocation word set, The optional Programming-Tools word set, The optional Locals word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section @c ===================================================================== @menu * memory-idef:: * memory-ambcond:: * memory-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node memory-idef, memory-ambcond, The optional Memory-Allocation word set, The optional Memory-Allocation word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node memory-ambcond, memory-other, memory-idef, The optional Memory-Allocation word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node memory-other, , memory-ambcond, The optional Memory-Allocation word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Programming-Tools word set, The optional Search-Order word set, The optional Memory-Allocation word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section @c ===================================================================== @menu * programming-idef:: * programming-ambcond:: * programming-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node programming-idef, programming-ambcond, The optional Programming-Tools word set, The optional Programming-Tools word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node programming-ambcond, programming-other, programming-idef, The optional Programming-Tools word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node programming-other, , programming-ambcond, The optional Programming-Tools word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional Search-Order word set, The optional String word set, The optional Programming-Tools word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section @c ===================================================================== @menu * search-idef:: * search-ambcond:: * search-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node search-idef, search-ambcond, The optional Search-Order word set, The optional Search-Order word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node search-ambcond, search-other, search-idef, The optional Search-Order word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node search-other, , search-ambcond, The optional Search-Order word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c ===================================================================== @node The optional String word set, , The optional Search-Order word set, ANS conformance @comment node-name, next, previous, up @section @c ===================================================================== @menu * string-idef:: * string-ambcond:: * string-other:: @end menu @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node string-idef, string-ambcond, The optional String word set, The optional String word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Implementation Defined Options @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node string-ambcond, string-other, string-idef, The optional String word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Ambiguous conditions @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @node string-other, , string-ambcond, The optional String word set @comment node-name, next, previous, up @subsection Other system documentation @c --------------------------------------------------------------------- @table @i @item @end table @node Model, Emacs and GForth, ANS conformance, Top @chapter Model @node Emacs and GForth, Internals, Model, Top @chapter Emacs and GForth GForth comes with @file{gforth.el}, an improved version of @file{forth.el} by Goran Rydqvist (icluded in the TILE package). The improvements are a better (but still not perfect) handling of indentation. I have also added comment paragraph filling (@kbd{M-q}), commenting (@kbd{C-x \}) and uncommenting (@kbd{C-u C-x \}) regions and removing debugging tracers (@kbd{C-x ~}, @pxref{Debugging}). I left the stuff I do not use alone, even though some of it only makes sense for TILE. To get a description of these features, enter Forth mode and type @kbd{C-h m}. In addition, GForth supports Emacs quite well: The source code locations given in error messages, debugging output (from @code{~~}) and failed assertion messages are in the right format for Emacs' compilation mode (@pxref{Compilation, , Running Compilations under Emacs, emacs, Emacs Manual}) so the source location corresponding to an error or other message is only a few keystrokes away (@kbd{C-x `} for the next error, @kbd{C-c C-c} for the error under the cursor). Also, if you @code{include} @file{etags.fs}, a new @file{TAGS} file (@pxref{Tags, , Tags Tables, emacs, Emacs Manual}) will be produced that contains the definitions of all words defined afterwards. You can then find the source for a word using @kbd{M-.}. Note that emacs can use several tags files at the same time (e.g., one for the gforth sources and one for your program). To get all these benefits, add the following lines to your @file{.emacs} file: @example (autoload 'forth-mode "gforth.el") (setq auto-mode-alist (cons '("\\.fs\\'" . forth-mode) auto-mode-alist)) @end example @node Internals, Bugs, Emacs and GForth, Top @chapter Internals Reading this section is not necessary for programming with gforth. It should be helpful for finding your way in the gforth sources. @menu * Portability:: * Threading:: * Primitives:: * System Architecture:: @end menu @node Portability, Threading, Internals, Internals @section Portability One of the main goals of the effort is availability across a wide range of personal machines. fig-Forth, and, to a lesser extent, F83, achieved this goal by manually coding the engine in assembly language for several then-popular processors. This approach is very labor-intensive and the results are short-lived due to progress in computer architecture. Others have avoided this problem by coding in C, e.g., Mitch Bradley (cforth), Mikael Patel (TILE) and Dirk Zoller (pfe). This approach is particularly popular for UNIX-based Forths due to the large variety of architectures of UNIX machines. Unfortunately an implementation in C does not mix well with the goals of efficiency and with using traditional techniques: Indirect or direct threading cannot be expressed in C, and switch threading, the fastest technique available in C, is significantly slower. Another problem with C is that it's very cumbersome to express double integer arithmetic. Fortunately, there is a portable language that does not have these limitations: GNU C, the version of C processed by the GNU C compiler (@pxref{C Extensions, , Extensions to the C Language Family, gcc.info, GNU C Manual}). Its labels as values feature (@pxref{Labels as Values, , Labels as Values, gcc.info, GNU C Manual}) makes direct and indirect threading possible, its @code{long long} type (@pxref{Long Long, , Double-Word Integers, gcc.info, GNU C Manual}) corresponds to Forths double numbers. GNU C is available for free on all important (and many unimportant) UNIX machines, VMS, 80386s running MS-DOS, the Amiga, and the Atari ST, so a Forth written in GNU C can run on all these machines@footnote{Due to Apple's look-and-feel lawsuit it is not available on the Mac (@pxref{Boycott, , Protect Your Freedom---Fight ``Look And Feel'', gcc.info, GNU C Manual}).}. Writing in a portable language has the reputation of producing code that is slower than assembly. For our Forth engine we repeatedly looked at the code produced by the compiler and eliminated most compiler-induced inefficiencies by appropriate changes in the source-code. However, register allocation cannot be portably influenced by the programmer, leading to some inefficiencies on register-starved machines. We use explicit register declarations (@pxref{Explicit Reg Vars, , Variables in Specified Registers, gcc.info, GNU C Manual}) to improve the speed on some machines. They are turned on by using the @code{gcc} switch @code{-DFORCE_REG}. Unfortunately, this feature not only depends on the machine, but also on the compiler version: On some machines some compiler versions produce incorrect code when certain explicit register declarations are used. So by default @code{-DFORCE_REG} is not used. @node Threading, Primitives, Portability, Internals @section Threading GNU C's labels as values extension (available since @code{gcc-2.0}, @pxref{Labels as Values, , Labels as Values, gcc.info, GNU C Manual}) makes it possible to take the address of @var{label} by writing @code{&&@var{label}}. This address can then be used in a statement like @code{goto *@var{address}}. I.e., @code{goto *&&x} is the same as @code{goto x}. With this feature an indirect threaded NEXT looks like: @example cfa = *ip++; ca = *cfa; goto *ca; @end example For those unfamiliar with the names: @code{ip} is the Forth instruction pointer; the @code{cfa} (code-field address) corresponds to ANS Forths execution token and points to the code field of the next word to be executed; The @code{ca} (code address) fetched from there points to some executable code, e.g., a primitive or the colon definition handler @code{docol}. Direct threading is even simpler: @example ca = *ip++; goto *ca; @end example Of course we have packaged the whole thing neatly in macros called @code{NEXT} and @code{NEXT1} (the part of NEXT after fetching the cfa). @menu * Scheduling:: * Direct or Indirect Threaded?:: * DOES>:: @end menu @node Scheduling, Direct or Indirect Threaded?, Threading, Threading @subsection Scheduling There is a little complication: Pipelined and superscalar processors, i.e., RISC and some modern CISC machines can process independent instructions while waiting for the results of an instruction. The compiler usually reorders (schedules) the instructions in a way that achieves good usage of these delay slots. However, on our first tries the compiler did not do well on scheduling primitives. E.g., for @code{+} implemented as @example n=sp[0]+sp[1]; sp++; sp[0]=n; NEXT; @end example the NEXT comes strictly after the other code, i.e., there is nearly no scheduling. After a little thought the problem becomes clear: The compiler cannot know that sp and ip point to different addresses (and the version of @code{gcc} we used would not know it even if it was possible), so it could not move the load of the cfa above the store to the TOS. Indeed the pointers could be the same, if code on or very near the top of stack were executed. In the interest of speed we chose to forbid this probably unused ``feature'' and helped the compiler in scheduling: NEXT is divided into the loading part (@code{NEXT_P1}) and the goto part (@code{NEXT_P2}). @code{+} now looks like: @example n=sp[0]+sp[1]; sp++; NEXT_P1; sp[0]=n; NEXT_P2; @end example This can be scheduled optimally by the compiler. This division can be turned off with the switch @code{-DCISC_NEXT}. This switch is on by default on machines that do not profit from scheduling (e.g., the 80386), in order to preserve registers. @node Direct or Indirect Threaded?, DOES>, Scheduling, Threading @subsection Direct or Indirect Threaded? Both! After packaging the nasty details in macro definitions we realized that we could switch between direct and indirect threading by simply setting a compilation flag (@code{-DDIRECT_THREADED}) and defining a few machine-specific macros for the direct-threading case. On the Forth level we also offer access words that hide the differences between the threading methods (@pxref{Threading Words}). Indirect threading is implemented completely machine-independently. Direct threading needs routines for creating jumps to the executable code (e.g. to docol or dodoes). These routines are inherently machine-dependent, but they do not amount to many source lines. I.e., even porting direct threading to a new machine is a small effort. @node DOES>, , Direct or Indirect Threaded?, Threading @subsection DOES> One of the most complex parts of a Forth engine is @code{dodoes}, i.e., the chunk of code executed by every word defined by a @code{CREATE}...@code{DOES>} pair. The main problem here is: How to find the Forth code to be executed, i.e. the code after the @code{DOES>} (the DOES-code)? There are two solutions: In fig-Forth the code field points directly to the dodoes and the DOES-code address is stored in the cell after the code address (i.e. at cfa cell+). It may seem that this solution is illegal in the Forth-79 and all later standards, because in fig-Forth this address lies in the body (which is illegal in these standards). However, by making the code field larger for all words this solution becomes legal again. We use this approach for the indirect threaded version. Leaving a cell unused in most words is a bit wasteful, but on the machines we are targetting this is hardly a problem. The other reason for having a code field size of two cells is to avoid having different image files for direct and indirect threaded systems (@pxref{System Architecture}). The other approach is that the code field points or jumps to the cell after @code{DOES}. In this variant there is a jump to @code{dodoes} at this address. @code{dodoes} can then get the DOES-code address by computing the code address, i.e., the address of the jump to dodoes, and add the length of that jump field. A variant of this is to have a call to @code{dodoes} after the @code{DOES>}; then the return address (which can be found in the return register on RISCs) is the DOES-code address. Since the two cells available in the code field are usually used up by the jump to the code address in direct threading, we use this approach for direct threading. We did not want to add another cell to the code field. @node Primitives, System Architecture, Threading, Internals @section Primitives @menu * Automatic Generation:: * TOS Optimization:: * Produced code:: @end menu @node Automatic Generation, TOS Optimization, Primitives, Primitives @subsection Automatic Generation Since the primitives are implemented in a portable language, there is no longer any need to minimize the number of primitives. On the contrary, having many primitives is an advantage: speed. In order to reduce the number of errors in primitives and to make programming them easier, we provide a tool, the primitive generator (@file{prims2x.fs}), that automatically generates most (and sometimes all) of the C code for a primitive from the stack effect notation. The source for a primitive has the following form: @format @var{Forth-name} @var{stack-effect} @var{category} [@var{pronounc.}] [@code{""}@var{glossary entry}@code{""}] @var{C code} [@code{:} @var{Forth code}] @end format The items in brackets are optional. The category and glossary fields are there for generating the documentation, the Forth code is there for manual implementations on machines without GNU C. E.g., the source for the primitive @code{+} is: @example + n1 n2 -- n core plus n = n1+n2; @end example This looks like a specification, but in fact @code{n = n1+n2} is C code. Our primitive generation tool extracts a lot of information from the stack effect notations@footnote{We use a one-stack notation, even though we have separate data and floating-point stacks; The separate notation can be generated easily from the unified notation.}: The number of items popped from and pushed on the stack, their type, and by what name they are referred to in the C code. It then generates a C code prelude and postlude for each primitive. The final C code for @code{+} looks like this: @example I_plus: /* + ( n1 n2 -- n ) */ /* label, stack effect */ /* */ /* documentation */ @{ DEF_CA /* definition of variable ca (indirect threading) */ Cell n1; /* definitions of variables */ Cell n2; Cell n; n1 = (Cell) sp[1]; /* input */ n2 = (Cell) TOS; sp += 1; /* stack adjustment */ NAME("+") /* debugging output (with -DDEBUG) */ @{ n = n1+n2; /* C code taken from the source */ @} NEXT_P1; /* NEXT part 1 */ TOS = (Cell)n; /* output */ NEXT_P2; /* NEXT part 2 */ @} @end example This looks long and inefficient, but the GNU C compiler optimizes quite well and produces optimal code for @code{+} on, e.g., the R3000 and the HP RISC machines: Defining the @code{n}s does not produce any code, and using them as intermediate storage also adds no cost. There are also other optimizations, that are not illustrated by this example: Assignments between simple variables are usually for free (copy propagation). If one of the stack items is not used by the primitive (e.g. in @code{drop}), the compiler eliminates the load from the stack (dead code elimination). On the other hand, there are some things that the compiler does not do, therefore they are performed by @file{prims2x.fs}: The compiler does not optimize code away that stores a stack item to the place where it just came from (e.g., @code{over}). While programming a primitive is usually easy, there are a few cases where the programmer has to take the actions of the generator into account, most notably @code{?dup}, but also words that do not (always) fall through to NEXT. @node TOS Optimization, Produced code, Automatic Generation, Primitives @subsection TOS Optimization An important optimization for stack machine emulators, e.g., Forth engines, is keeping one or more of the top stack items in registers. If a word has the stack effect @var{in1}...@var{inx} @code{--} @var{out1}...@var{outy}, keeping the top @var{n} items in registers @itemize @item is better than keeping @var{n-1} items, if @var{x>=n} and @var{y>=n}, due to fewer loads from and stores to the stack. @item is slower than keeping @var{n-1} items, if @var{x<>y} and @var{x