052090 IMAGE PROCESSING,CONFERENCES,FIGGY Sunday Figgy for May 20, 1990. Forth for prototyping page composition on an ElectroPress image processor that must handle 4000 different fonts on a 20"x17" 300 DPI image. Teaching Forth to cobol programmers. Dayton Ohio, a hotbed of Forth! Forth as the orignal language for WordPerfect. PolyForth for the 386. Forth vs C. Figgy Bar May 20 1990 Item 5813841 90/05/21 10:03 From: STENO.POOL RTC Stenographer Pool To: NMORGENSTERN N. Leonard Morgenstern Sub: Minutes of your RT Conference. >From Steno: Jennifer Marlowe Date: 05/20/90 Time: 21:59EDT Attendees: [[Len] NMORGENSTERN] [[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2] [GARY-S] [[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1] [[Larry] LDAWSON] Minutes: is here. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> What's up? <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Nothing. We two only. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have been forth ing all day <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Doing what with Forth? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Well I am making a "proofer" <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> pmi (Pardon my ignorance) but what is a proofer? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> a proofer f <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> a proofer "proof" a page composition on a laserjett <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Thanx <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> ooops It is a neat graphics exercise, the image plane is 6 MEGABYTES <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I have only done a few very primitive things in graphics. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Some years ago I programmed a log chart printout <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> There is alot of stuff <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> but it took 15 minutes to print a blank chart so <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I gave up. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> ga <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> for graphics <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> on this board <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Yes there is. Have you tried any? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Have you ever heard of a raster image processor? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> yea I sure have. NICE! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I think so. Raster is like TV screen processing <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Effectively it is an expensive character generator! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> laser printers use them to render the bits for a character in a spec'd font <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> If you could give some specific comments on especially useful <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> files, it would make this more valuable when it is posted <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> . <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have used the files by mike Sperl. He updates it frequently <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I use these words to make a viewport on the 6 meg image <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> have you seen Tom Zimmers TCOM <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Yes, very nice, but you have to do certain things exactly right. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> The biggest lack is CREATE ... DOES> <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> yea, it's sorta tough to catch on to <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Very finicky. I have, however, written <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> several file filters with it, and they come out 4k bytes or so. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> isn't there a similar thing th <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> tho called :does> <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Let me look it up <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Sorry, don't have it. We are painting the house & it is <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> in a box somewhere. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> fun! I hate house projects... Until they are done! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> The way TCOM works is that defining words are in the "library" <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> If you know how, you can add them there. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> it should be faster too <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> that FPC that is <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> But you can get along without them, even if a bit clumsy. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Yes, F-PC is fast, but it is a memory hog! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Pretty neat concept thj <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> tho <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Very, considering that about 80% or more is one guy's work! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I love fpc. who cares about memory? I wish we have FPC#*^ <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> wish we had fpc386 <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Tom will write it next week! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> (A joke. When he was developing it, it was literally true <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> that if you had last week's version, you might already be out of date.) <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i think fpthat FPC386 would be GREAT <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> C. H. Ting practically twisted Tom's arm & made him forego updates <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> for 1 year. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> that is a prob form me because i must change nucleus in my app. It's hard <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> to follow updates <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Join the club. I am a hobbyist so I have little problem, <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> but that is the complaint all around from professionals. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> By the way, better tracking of versions should be an advantage <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> if you buy a commercial Forth. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I use it professionally, but still feel like an amatrer <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> even after 6 years <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> There were a number of changes between 2.25 and 3.5 that were not <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> as well documented as they should have been. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I went from 2.25 directly to 3.5 <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Those are the only ones that were "officially" released. is here. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> myhi <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Some people have some what you might call "inter-beta" versions <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Hi Dennis. Hello Len, mdc <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> hi <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Mdc is talking about F-PC yea? so what's up? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I find that tthe segmentation of the PC which is a curse in many ways <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> ga <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> can keep the forth creed of KISS (keep it small stupid!) because cr <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> bebecause cramming everything into 640 keeps you on your toes <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have been training more customers in forth! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> These customers are what? Engineers? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Well.... Most are cobol types. the last was a SMART mainframe OPERATOR! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> What are their reactions? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> the application language will let them do a lot without going to forth. All immediately <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> want to use it tho. NO printing task has been unable to be written. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> The reaction to forth has been very favorable! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> That confirms what many say. Those that come to Forth without too many <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> prejudices learn it easily and like it. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I think a cobol programmer doesn't have prejudices? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> that is exactly true especially if they dont have to use it. It allows <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> them to use the system for a while and learn forth in bits & pieces <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Dennis, I think they have little snobbishness <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> C and Pascal programmers think of themselves as "professionals" <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> and look down at anything unfamiliar as inferior <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> "If I don't know about it, how can it be good?" <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> . <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have embarked on a mission to replace 1.5 million $ worth of <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> hardware with a simulation on a 386/33mhz pc! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> (eagerly awaiting details) Tell us more!!! sounds like fun! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Well the ElectroPress is very pricy to run. We need to test "jobs" offline <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> with a RIP simulator. It must handle 4000 different fonts <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> and do basic graphics <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> on a 20"x17" 300 DPI image yes, it sounds like a simulator is essential <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Sounds like something that is perfect for Forth. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> my boss has decided that it should be done in FORTH. The last project sold him <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Even C addicts agree that FORTH was perfect "for this project" best simulation language around <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have 3 versions already. 1 for the press, one to send the raw data to the <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> screen and one to "decode" it back into english. Now i must do the actual rasterized <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> version <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> meet your needs.Programming in Forth is unlike any other language. It is more like writing a computer language that will meet your needs. so what's the problem with F-PC? is here. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I won't use anything else. No problem with getting work here in forth hi dean <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> hi all <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Hi Dean <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> 'lo <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> no problem getting work WHERE in forth? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have no problem with f-pc . I realy like it <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Are there any other Forthers in Dayton <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> here in dayton ohio <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> lots. the Air force base uses it and several companies here are alive because of it <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Can you give some specifics? <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> seems like no one but me has heard of it in utah <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> dayton'sspecific how <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> specific how? <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> University of Utah and BYU both have strong CS departments <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I'll bet that if you put up notices on their bulletin boards <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> you could get enough together to organize a FIG chapter! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> dayton's pretty nice. the cost of living is very low <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> There used to be a chapter in Orem UT (40 miles south) but it died right about when I got into forth <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> it was listed in forth dimensions one month, then disappeared the next <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Orem is where WordPerfect is. I believe that the early versions <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> were written in Forth. <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> are there enough Forther's around to get it beck going Dean? <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> really? didn't know that <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> What platforms do you all use <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> Oh yea, I even have SSI Forth <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> Well so far I've found me, and.... that's all <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> WordPerfect Corp, used to be Satelite Software International <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> The produced a Forth for a time <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> My interest is teaching Forth, and I want a good learner's language <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I like F83, except for its kludgey editor. FPC is too big <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> although I like it for personal use. <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> and WordPerfect WAS originally written in Forth <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> why'd they change? <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> New ammunition for my Forth debate down at work <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> change what, then name or the language <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> So why did they quit using forth? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> the lang <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> because they wanted to port it to other platforms <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> I thought the party line was, Forth ports to everything <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> pretty tought to write something for Unix in native Forth <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i have often written po <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> Forth is portable, but you usually have to write it yourself to do it <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> 'test' platforms in forth as a demo and ended up finishing it before we finished the spec <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Forth is very good for new stuff. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> B.it is the vary fastest development platform, bar none <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Managers often don't like it because they believe that <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> it is hard to maintiain. <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> Almost everyone agrees on Forth's prototype abilities <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> it is only hard to maintain because good forthers are hard to find <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> but maintainability and portability still goes to C <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> and C programmers are a dime a dozen <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> hiss! hiss! <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> the same for C compilers <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> That's sometimes all they are worth Dennis, but if <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> they are adequate for the job, then they get hired. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> You are right, though. Managers fear that they won't be <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> you don't have to be very good if the compiler does all the optimization for you <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> able to get someone to maintain their program, and will <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have been involved in several C ports and it is less than simple in some cases! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> decide to rewrite them in C, sometimes at great expense. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> and years of time. <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> exactly Mike, but the fact that the compiler are there "confuses" some people <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have often stepped in to save a project mired in C <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> to finish it in weeks where they had worked for month and in one case years! <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> that can be said for any language Mike <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I agree but it has happened alot to be an accident <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> at Forth, Inc., we have even done that when it was written in Forth (by incompetant programmers of course :-) <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> often the problem is not the language, but the design <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> dennis tell me about FORTH inc's 386 system, please> <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> 386 pF is a protected mode, flat model Forth <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> it switches back to real mode to call DOS <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> with access to DOS if needed ? <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> anything you want <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> is it based on G. bailey's work <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> ah, I'm not sure who did it first is here. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Dennis, pmi (pardon my ignorance) but what is a "flat model" Forth? <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> but Greg uses a lot of pF stuff <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Ho, Larry <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> flat model means that the dictionary pointers are a full 32 bits <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i means that you have up to 4 gig of memory, no segmentation <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Thanx <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> not any of this segmented stuff like F-PC uses <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> well not really 4 gig Mike <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> why? <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> there is a problem with standards over 1 Meg <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> in fact, on a IBM machine, you have a problem after 640K <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> because that is where they put the video and other drivers <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> bailey's native didnt't have that prob. <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> yes it does, but he probably just skips the dictionary over it <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> true, he HOP's over the mess! <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> there is no way to remove that section of memory between 640 and 1 Meg <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> Doesn't hopping over get messy at the seam? <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> then, every program has a different method to deal with what's above 1 Meg <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> My app delivers the compiler and interpreter to the customer. Pretty pricey to do that wth poly <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> yes, that would require a lisence or something <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> yea for several 1000$ <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> but you could probably talk a deal <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> as long as you don't give your customers access to the nucleus <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> the up front cost is no big deal but the recurring costs are a bear to sell <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> to the boss <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> have you talked with Forth, Inc. marketing yet? <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> brb <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> well i have done it in fpc I planned to jump ship if i ran out of steam but <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i was able to finish it <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> do you ship the meta compiler with your system? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> the proofer uses massive amounts of memory tho. flat would be nice <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> yes but it's not a requirement <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> you should talk to us, and see what it might cost <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i'll do that <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> I can't quote prices, but it seems that <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> if you get rid of the nucleus and target compiler <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> you shouldn't have to pay for each copy shipped <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> hmm <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> but then, I'm not in marketing <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> they make those decisions <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i get so sick of segments! <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> well, give them a call <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i have been sending a token payment to Tom Z when i ship a system <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> to encourage him <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> I've got to leave now <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> bye <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Bye Dennis <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> my son needs a solder job <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> see ya later <[Dennis] D.RUFFER> has left. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I have to leave in about 5 minutes <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> where is pear.l city <[Larry] LDAWSON> PC is about 145 miles w of chicago, 15 miles s. of Wisconsin <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> What kind of work do you do? <[Larry] LDAWSON> Librarian <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Public? <[Larry] LDAWSON> Engineering <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i see starting forth back on the shelfs <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Ah! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i could enjoy reading all day! <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> ha ha is here. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Don't recommend first edition. Too idiosyncratic. <[Larry] LDAWSON> I wish I could, can't, too busy <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Secnod is much better <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Pygmy, avalilable on this board, has a set of <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> words that make it compatible with Starting Forth, and <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i wish Leo B would write Being Forth <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> it should be very good for beginners. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Have you read his Thinking Forth? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> 20 times <[Larry] LDAWSON> Forth for Beginners, by Lampton is very elementary no longer in publication <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> great book <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i want more! <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> A book I like is Kelly and Spies. Not quite so good for beginners <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> as Brody, but takes you a bit further, and is therefore <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> more generally interesting. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> ga Kelly and Spies <[Larry] LDAWSON> Burnap's FORTH, the 4th generation lang. has some interesting features. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> A lot of these books are available from Forth Interest Group. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I think I have read every forth book there is, but mighta missed a few <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> ga Larry. <[Larry] LDAWSON> Are we in FORMAL? <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Brody is the only book that is consistently to be found <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> in bookstores. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> we have a great bookstaore here in dayton. One of the best in the country i am told <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> No we aren't formal, but I like to end with ga <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> so people know I am thruoug. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> sorry, ga <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> ga A book a lot of people overlook which is 'EXCELLENT' for Forth usres on a pc is "Library of Forth Routines and Utilities" by James Terry <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Do you like it? I find it hard to make out. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> . <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> Some good ideas <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> in it I like it a lot - especially if I get stuck on some silly routine - I also like Feierbach's bookk for the same reason <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> I will have to study it more. <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> thinking forth is one of the best computer books i have every read on any <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> language <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Gentlemen: I have to leave. Why don't I give time for <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> any final comments. <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> ga <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> ga You guys want to chat a bit (wee bit ) longer, Len has to go <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> ga <[Larry] LDAWSON> ga <[Len] NMORGENSTERN> Bye all [ Gary takes over as leader ] Worked like a charm - any thing you want to discuss for a few more moments ? is here. It worked len - go away ! My curiosity made me come back & see what happened has left. What were you doing - besides book reviews ? This is NOT formal - go somebody <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> we were discussing TCOM earlier <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> by T Zimmer I'm not a big F-PC fan <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> too big? <[Larry] LDAWSON> Well, I gotta go too, Night all. <[Larry] LDAWSON> has left. too verbose - and tends to bury the Forth underbelly <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i love all the goodies. Plus having the source is a pre req to me! Having said that - I do like BBL, but I don't keep the Abundance stuff No arguments from me - I was just noting a preference. <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> what's Abundance like, as compared to othe database languages? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> i cant use typical "pro" systems. I especialluy agree that source is a MUST <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> no source is included Roedy wrote Abun to be a do-all for a small to medium large business. Hence the name. The resources are VERY ABUNDANT and surprisingly fast. <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> So it's not really a generic database language like dBase or something? no - it is a total MIS management package You can do payroll, supplies, form letters, and the marquis in front of the store with Abundance <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> sounds neat, I'll take a look <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> The marquis? Serious? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> what do you think of the TCOM compiler It also just happens to be able to do a dBase type thingee too, and comes with two very slick assemblers <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> It's very <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> unusual It wouldn't be fair for me to comment on TCOM - I lack the hands on to properly express an opinion <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> A C guy suggested that forth needed something like it, then Tom Intro'd it! I use Unix and I cringe at all this 'make Forth more C like talk" They are distnctly different vehicles <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> You use forth on UNIX? I know they both meta - after that the roads are considerably different <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> In some ways C is getting more like FORTH, witness the new Instant C stuff The only Forth's currently available on Unix are not true in some respects, but yes, I have Mitch Bradley's CForth and Mike Patel's TILES up on Unix <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> So you write in c alot? I didn't say that. I don't claim to be a wizzard at anything but spelling Smith :-) I do SysOp on here and also the GEnie Unix RT <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> I have a ?. I am a fig member, how do i get access here to fig lib? leave e-mail to D.Ruffer <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> thx no prob - anything else before we lock the gate ? <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> nope. <[Dean] D.MARTINDAL1> no <[mdc] M.CHRISTOPH2> has left. I do need to go to. You guys can stay and chat - whatever g'nite === End of Steno notes. === =END=